Author
Listed:
- Grant E. Brown
- Jean-Francois Poirier
- James C. Adrian
Abstract
The ability to accurately assess local predation risk is critical to prey individuals, as it allows them to maximize threat-sensitive trade-offs between predator avoidance and other fitness related activities. A wide range of taxonomically diverse prey (including many freshwater fishes) relies on chemical alarm cues (alarm pheromones) as their primary information source for local risk assessment. However, the value of chemical alarm cues has been questioned due to the availability of additional sensory inputs (i.e., visual cues) and the lack of an overt antipredator response under conditions of low perceived risk. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that chemical alarm cues at concentrations below the point at which they elicit an overt behavioral response function to increase vigilance towards other sensory modalities (i.e., visual alarm cues). Shoals of glowlight tetras (Hemigrammus erythrozonus) exposed to the subthreshold concentration of hypoxanthine-3-N-oxide (the putative Ostariophysan alarm pheromone) did not exhibit an overt antipredator response in the absence of secondary visual cues (not different than the distilled water control). However, when exposed to the sight of a visually alarmed conspecific, they significantly increased the intensity of their antipredator response (not different from shoals exposed to the suprathreshold alarm cue). This study demonstrates that prey may benefit from responding to low concentration alarm cues by increasing vigilance towards secondary cues during local risk assessment, even in the absence of an overt behavioral response. By increasing vigilance towards secondary risk assessment cues in the presence of a low risk chemical cue, individuals are likely able to maximize the threat-sensitive trade-offs between predator avoidance and other fitness related activities. Copyright 2004.
Suggested Citation
Grant E. Brown & Jean-Francois Poirier & James C. Adrian, 2004.
"Assessment of local predation risk: the role of subthreshold concentrations of chemical alarm cues,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(5), pages 810-815, September.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:810-815
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:810-815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.