IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i5p766-778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polygynandry in a red fox population: implications for the evolution of group living in canids?

Author

Listed:
  • Philip J. Baker
  • Stephan M. Funk
  • Michael W. Bruford
  • Stephen Harris

Abstract

Canid social groups are typically thought to consist of extended families, that is, a dominant breeding pair and related nonbreeding subordinates, that principally obtain indirect fitness benefits from helping to raise the offspring of the dominant pair. Consequently, the monogamous pair has been viewed as the basic fundamental unit of canid social organization. However, there have been few genetic studies that have tested this assumption. We analyzed the parentage of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in a high-density (19.6--27.7 adult foxes/km-super-2) population in Bristol, UK, to determine (1) whether groups typically produced a single litter of cubs annually and (2) whether male and female foxes exhibited monogamous mating strategies. Social monogamy (the production of one litter in a social group) was observed or assumed in 54% of breeding attempts (N = 13 group-years). However, polyandrous and polygynous patterns of mating were common. Multiple paternity was confirmed in 38% of litters (N = 16) containing offspring with resolved maternity and paternity (N = 30 cubs); when including cubs with unresolved paternity (N = 20), multiple-paternity may have occurred in 69% of litters. Litters were sired by an average of 1.6 identified males (range = 1--4); when including cubs with unresolved paternity, litters may have been sired by up to seven males. Only 20% (6/30) of cubs with resolved maternity and paternity were sired by males within the social group. Within groups, dominant females did not breed with subordinate males; dominant males did breed with subordinate females. Dominant and subordinate females both produced cubs with dominant and subordinate males from other social groups. Mean adult relatedness in groups typically ranged from 0.15--0.35, indicative of second-order rather than first-order relatives. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip J. Baker & Stephan M. Funk & Michael W. Bruford & Stephen Harris, 2004. "Polygynandry in a red fox population: implications for the evolution of group living in canids?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(5), pages 766-778, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:766-778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jo Dorning & Stephen Harris, 2017. "Dominance, gender, and season influence food patch use in a group-living, solitary foraging canid," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1302-1313.
    2. Helen M Whiteside & Deborah A Dawson & Carl D Soulsbury & Stephen Harris, 2011. "Mother Knows Best: Dominant Females Determine Offspring Dispersal in Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-7, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:766-778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.