IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i4p607-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Against the odds? Nestling sex ratio variation in green-rumped parrotlets

Author

Listed:
  • Amber E. Budden
  • Steven R. Beissinger

Abstract

We investigated nestling sex ratio variation in the green-rumped parrotlet (Forpus passerinus), a small neotropical parrot breeding in central Venezuela. There are strong theoretical reasons to predict a female-biased sex ratio in this system according to the local resource hypothesis; juvenile males are philopatric and there are high levels of competition between male siblings for access to breeding females. Data were collected from two breeding sites over a 14-year period incorporating 564 broods with a total of 2728 nestlings. The mean percentage of male nestlings across years was 51%. Despite extreme hatching asynchrony in this system and increased survival of earlier hatched offspring, there was no bias in sex allocation associated with egg sequence. Patterns in sex allocation were not associated with clutch size, age, or size of the breeding female or breeding site. The potential for selective resorption of eggs was considered; however, no significant relationship was found between extended laying intervals and the sex of subsequent eggs. Together, these results suggest that female parrotlets are unable to regulate the sex ratio of their clutch at laying or that facultative manipulation of nestling sex ratio may not confer a fitness benefit to breeders in these populations. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber E. Budden & Steven R. Beissinger, 2004. "Against the odds? Nestling sex ratio variation in green-rumped parrotlets," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(4), pages 607-613, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:4:p:607-613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:4:p:607-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.