IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i3p380-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutual ornamentation, sexual selection, and social dominance in the black swan

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Kraaijeveld
  • John Gregurke
  • Carol Hall
  • Jan Komdeur
  • Raoul A. Mulder

Abstract

We investigated the adaptive significance of a sexually monomorphic ornament in the black swan Cygnus atratus. Both sexes grow curled feathers on their wings (range 7--22 curled feathers per wing), which are displayed prominently in a range of social interactions. The number of curled feathers increased until the birds reached sexual maturity (at 2 years of age) but did not vary with age thereafter. We found evidence for both sexual and social functions of the ornament. Paired, mature individuals of both sexes had higher numbers of curled feathers than unpaired, mature birds, and individuals paired assortatively with respect to curled feather number, suggesting the feathers may be involved in mutual sexual selection. More ornamented individuals were dominant in agonistic interactions with birds of the same sex and pairing status. Highly ornamented pairs were also more likely to maintain extended tenancy of preferred cygnet feeding areas, which resulted in improved offspring survival. The curled feathers thus appear to function as a signal of social dominance, which is highly correlated with reproductive success and is therefore a reliable signal of parental quality in mate choice. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Kraaijeveld & John Gregurke & Carol Hall & Jan Komdeur & Raoul A. Mulder, 2004. "Mutual ornamentation, sexual selection, and social dominance in the black swan," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(3), pages 380-389, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:3:p:380-389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:3:p:380-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.