IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i2p351-356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual selection and mating patterns in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism

Author

Listed:
  • Albrecht I. Schulte-Hostedde
  • John S. Millar
  • H. Lisle Gibbs

Abstract

In mammals, species with highly male-biased sexual size dimorphism tend to have high variance in male reproductive success. However, little information is available on patterns of sexual selection, variation in male and female reproductive success, and body size and mating success in species with female-biased size dimorphism. We used parentage data from microsatellite DNA loci to examine these issues in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus), a small ground squirrel with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Chipmunks were monitored over 3 years in the Kananaskis Valley, Alberta, Canada. We found evidence of high levels of multiple paternity within litters. Variation in male and female reproductive success was equal, and the opportunity for sexual selection was only marginally higher in males than females. Male and female reproductive success both depended on mating success. We found no evidence that the number of genetic mates a male had depended on body size. Our results are consistent with a promiscuous mating system in which males and female mate with multiple partners. Low variation in male reproductive success may be a general feature of mammalian species in which females are larger than males. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Albrecht I. Schulte-Hostedde & John S. Millar & H. Lisle Gibbs, 2004. "Sexual selection and mating patterns in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(2), pages 351-356, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:351-356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:351-356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.