IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i2p338-344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scent-marking displays provide honest signals of health and infection

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah M. Zala
  • Wayne K. Potts
  • Dustin J. Penn

Abstract

Males of many species produce scent marks and other olfactory signals that function to intimidate rivals and attract females. It has been suggested that scent marks provide an honest, cheat-proof display of an individual's health and condition. Here we report several findings that address this hypothesis in wild-derived house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). (1) We exposed males to female odor, which induces an increase in testosterone, and found that sexual stimulation significantly increased the males' scent-marking and the attractiveness of their scent marks to females. (2) We challenged sexually stimulated males with a nonreplicating strain of bacteria (Salmonella enterica C5TS) to activate immunity and found that this significantly decreased the males' scent-marking and the attractiveness of their scent marks to females. (3) We collected scent marks from infected and sham-infected males when they were sexually stimulated or not, and we found that females could significantly discriminate the scent marks of infected versus control males, but only when the males were sexually stimulated. Taken together, our results indicate that male mice modulate their scent-marking display depending on their health and perceived mating opportunities. Increased scent marking enhances males' attractiveness to females, scent marks provide an honest indicator of bacterial infection (and perhaps immune activation), and females are able to assess the health of males more easily when males mark at a high rate. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah M. Zala & Wayne K. Potts & Dustin J. Penn, 2004. "Scent-marking displays provide honest signals of health and infection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(2), pages 338-344, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:338-344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:338-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.