IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i2p248-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discrimination and classification of foraging paths produced by search-tactic models

Author

Listed:
  • Chris L. Higgins
  • Richard E. Strauss

Abstract

Search tactics are cognitive processes, or decision mechanisms, that organisms use to locate available resources such as food, mates, refugia, and high-quality habitats. However, our knowledge of the actual tactics that animals use while searching for resources is limited, and very little empirical evidence has been accumulated. Therefore, we developed a suite of search-tactic models (1) to simulate possible searching behaviors of mobile organisms so that inferences can be made about their decision mechanisms, and (2) to determine the extent to which different models produce paths that approximate a globally optimal solution. The search-tactic models included deterministic and probabilistic searches in attempt to characterize biologically plausible searching behaviors. Classical linear multivariate methods (discriminant function analysis, Mahalanobis distances) and nonlinear artificial neural networks were used to discriminate the paths produced by the different models and to classify "unknown" foraging paths into one of the search-tactic models, based on the geometry of the resulting paths. Both linear and nonlinear analyses suggested that it is possible for animals to use a nearest-neighbor search tactic to search with near-optimum efficiency without having complete knowledge of the specific locations of all available resources. Furthermore, both methods of analyses demonstrated that it might be possible to use characteristics of foraging paths in an experimental setting to make inferences about the actual decision mechanisms animals use while searching for resources. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris L. Higgins & Richard E. Strauss, 2004. "Discrimination and classification of foraging paths produced by search-tactic models," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(2), pages 248-254, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:248-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zoroa, N. & Fernández-Sáez, M.J. & Zoroa, P., 2011. "A foraging problem: Sit-and-wait versus active predation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 131-141, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:248-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.