IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i6p787-792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do male two-spotted gobies prefer large fecund females?

Author

Listed:
  • Christophe Pe´labon
  • Åsa A. Borg
  • Jens Bjelvenmark
  • Elisabet Forsgren
  • Iain Barber
  • Trond Amundsen

Abstract

A male mating preference for large females may be expected when female size is correlated with fecundity. We tested for such a preference in a fish, the two-spotted goby (Gobiusculus flavescens, Gobiidae), for which a male preference for colorful females has been demonstrated. We offered males a choice between two stimulus females of different size, controlling for female color and stage of egg maturation. We also analyzed the relationship between size and fecundity (total number of eggs in the clutch) by allowing females of different size to spawn in a controlled environment. Female length explained 37% of the variation in fecundity, but males showed only a weak preference for large females. We compared the coefficient of variation (CV) in fecundity between female two-spotted gobies and other fish species for which male preferences for large females have been reported. The CV in fecundity in the two-spotted goby was among the lowest. We suggest that the low variation limits the potential fecundity benefit to be gained by a male selecting females on the basis of size alone. Our study emphasizes the importance of the variation in partner quality for the direction and the strength of mate preferences, as suggested by theoretical models. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Christophe Pe´labon & Åsa A. Borg & Jens Bjelvenmark & Elisabet Forsgren & Iain Barber & Trond Amundsen, 2003. "Do male two-spotted gobies prefer large fecund females?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(6), pages 787-792, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:6:p:787-792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg074
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:6:p:787-792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.