IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i5p730-735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food supplementation affects extrapair paternity in house sparrows (Passer domesticus)

Author

Listed:
  • Radovan Va´clav
  • Herbert Hoi
  • Donald Blomqvist

Abstract

Extrapair paternity (EPP) is common among birds, but the reasons why it varies within and among species are less clear. In particular, few studies have experimentally examined how food availability influences paternity and sexual behavior. We manipulated food supply in a nest-box population of house sparrows, Passer domesticus, a colonial passerine with extensive biparental care. During three successive breeding attempts, we changed food availability at nest sites and examined behavior and genetic parentage. DNA fingerprinting revealed that the level of EPP within broods was five times lower in pairs nesting at sites continuously supplied with extra food. With extra food, mates spent longer time together at the nest, but this was mainly due to a change in female behavior; females but not males increased total nest attendance. Moreover, we found that individual males did not change within-pair copulation frequency across treatments, suggesting that our experiment did not influence male control over fertilizations through copulation behavior. Instead, our study shows that ecological factors can have a strong influence on the time budgets of males and females, which consequently affects the occurrence of EPP. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Radovan Va´clav & Herbert Hoi & Donald Blomqvist, 2003. "Food supplementation affects extrapair paternity in house sparrows (Passer domesticus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(5), pages 730-735, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:5:p:730-735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:5:p:730-735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.