Author
Abstract
In organisms whose offspring develop in discrete habitat patches such as pools, studies have frequently shown that adults avoid sites based on a single risk factor facing offspring. However, natural reproductive sites often vary in multiple risk factors in both space and time. In this study, I used choice tests among field mesocosms to determine whether adults of a Neotropical anuran, Edalorhina perezi, select the safest pools for offspring based on two biotic risks of different magnitude: insect predators and conspecific competitors. I also investigated whether adult site-choice was context dependent (i.e., whether it varied by sex or by season or whether it was based on local pool quality). I found that both sexes avoided pools containing predatory insects, but only females significantly avoided those containing conspecific tadpoles. When offered two risky options, both sexes favored pools with competitors over those with predators. Site-choice behavior also varied depending on the temporal and spatial context. Female sensitivity to insect predators decreased late in the season. In addition, both sexes exhibited dampened reproductive activity when only risky sites were available locally. This study emphasizes that social and environmental factors simultaneously impact reproductive site choice. Whether a site is accepted ultimately depends not only on the assessment of mortality risks to offspring but also on the sex and spatiotemporal context of the decision maker. Copyright 2003.
Suggested Citation
Peter J. Murphy, 2003.
"Context-dependent reproductive site choice in a Neotropical frog,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(5), pages 626-633, September.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:5:p:626-633
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:5:p:626-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.