IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i5p612-618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heritability of three condition surrogates in the yellow dung fly

Author

Listed:
  • Wolf U. Blanckenhorn
  • David J. Hosken

Abstract

Condition capture has been proposed as a general mechanism maintaining additive genetic variation, V-sub-a, in sexually selected traits under directional selection. It relies on two main assumptions: condition-dependent trait expression and V-sub-a in condition. Although there is evidence for the former, direct evidence that condition is heritable is scarce, although this is a requirement of most models of handicap sexual selection. We used a parent--offspring, full-sib, two-container laboratory breeding design in the yellow dung fly Scathophaga stercoraria to demonstrate the broad- and narrow-sense heritability of three surrogates of condition commonly used in sexual selection studies: lipid and glycogen reserves (i.e., physiological condition), body size, and fluctuating asymmetry. All three measures are nutrition dependent and have been linked to sexual selection in free-living yellow dung flies. While lipid reserves and body size were heritable, asymmetry and glycogen reserves were not. Moreover, the evolvability of physiological condition was higher than that of the other two traits. Of the three surrogates, physiological condition is most akin to the original definition, but all have their limitations. We conclude that condition is a useful heuristic concept in evolutionary ecology, but its practical value may be limited by the fact that it cannot be measured directly. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolf U. Blanckenhorn & David J. Hosken, 2003. "Heritability of three condition surrogates in the yellow dung fly," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(5), pages 612-618, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:5:p:612-618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:5:p:612-618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.