IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i4p486-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Breeding success in cooperative meerkats: effects of helper number and maternal state

Author

Listed:
  • A. F. Russell
  • P. N. M. Brotherton
  • G. M. McIlrath
  • L. L. Sharpe
  • T. H. Clutton-Brock

Abstract

Studies of cooperatively breeding birds and mammals generally concentrate on the effects that helpers have on the number of reproductive attempts females have per year or on the number and size of offspring that survive from hatching/weaning to independence. However, helpers may also influence breeding success before hatching or weaning. In the present study, we used an ultrasound imager to determine litter sizes close to birth, and multivariate statistics to investigate whether helpers influence female fecundity, offspring survival to weaning, and offspring size at weaning in cooperative meerkats, Suricata suricatta. We found that the number of helpers in a group was correlated with the number of litters that females delivered each year, probably because females in large groups gave birth earlier and had shorter interbirth intervals. In addition, although pup survival between birth and weaning was primarily influenced by maternal dominance status, helper number may also have a significant positive effect. By contrast, we found no evidence to suggest that helpers have a direct effect on either litter sizes at birth or pup weights at weaning, which were both significantly influenced by maternal weight at conception. However, because differences in maternal weight were associated with differences in helper number, helpers have the potential to influence maternal fecundity and offspring size within reproductive attempts indirectly. These results suggest that future studies may need to consider direct and indirect helper effects on female fecundity and investment before assessing helper effects on reproductive success in societies of cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • A. F. Russell & P. N. M. Brotherton & G. M. McIlrath & L. L. Sharpe & T. H. Clutton-Brock, 2003. "Breeding success in cooperative meerkats: effects of helper number and maternal state," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(4), pages 486-492, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:486-492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James L. Savage & Andrew F. Russell & Rufus A. Johnstone, 2013. "Maternal costs in offspring production affect investment rules in joint rearing," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 750-758.
    2. C.M. Young & L.E. Browning & J.L. Savage & S.C. Griffith & Andrew F. Russell, 2013. "No evidence for deception over allocation to brood care in a cooperative bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 70-81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:486-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.