IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i3p326-333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female mate preferences and subsequent resistance to copulation in the mallard

Author

Listed:
  • Emma J. A. Cunningham

Abstract

In the majority of socially monogamous bird species, females solicit or accept copulations from males other than their partner. Females may gain direct benefits from extrapair males, such as greater access to resources, or indirect genetic benefits that will influence the future success of their offspring. However, one group of birds appears to be the exception to this general rule; in the wildfowl (Anseriformes), all extrapair copulations appear to be resisted by females. It has been suggested that resistance behavior may be a strategy to allow females a greater choice of mates, either at the precopulatory level (to promote choice of copulation partner) and/or the postcopulatory level (to promote multiple mating to increase their choice of sperm). This paper examines the function of female resistance behavior in one of the dabbling ducks, the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). Observations on a marked population of wild mallard and experiments with captive birds found that although females showed a strong preference for particular males that are the first to molt into their breeding plumage, male attractiveness did not influence female responses to pair or extrapair copulation attempts. Female resistance decreased the likelihood that copulation attempts would end in successful insemination. The findings did not support the hypothesis that females resist copulations to promote female choice and the reasons why waterfowl may benefit from avoiding all extrapair copulations are discussed. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma J. A. Cunningham, 2003. "Female mate preferences and subsequent resistance to copulation in the mallard," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(3), pages 326-333, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:3:p:326-333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:3:p:326-333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.