IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i2p282-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues

Author

Listed:
  • Shala J. Hankison
  • Molly R. Morris

Abstract

Females increase their risk of mating with heterospecifics when they prefer the traits of conspecifics that overlap with traits found in heterospecifics. Xiphophorus pygmaeus females have a strong preference for larger males, which could lead to females preferring to mate with heterospecific males; almost all sympatric X. cortezi males are larger than X. pygmaeus males. In this study, we show that X. pygmaeus females preferred the chemical cues from conspecifics over those of X. cortezi males. However, preference for the chemical cues of conspecifics could not reverse the preference for larger heterospecific males. Only when females were presented with two species-specific cues (vertical bars and chemical cues) did more females spend more time on average with the smaller conspecific males. These results support the "backup signal" hypothesis for the evolution of multiple preferences; together, the two species-specific cues increased the accuracy with which females were able to avoid heterospecific males. In addition, the results suggest that in those situations in which the traits of conspecifics overlap with traits found in heterospecifics, females can use the assessment of multiple cues to avoid mating with heterospecifics without compromising their preference for the highest-quality conspecific. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Shala J. Hankison & Molly R. Morris, 2003. "Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(2), pages 282-287, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:282-287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:282-287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.