IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i2p274-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cause of correlations between nightly numbers of male and female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) attending choruses

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher G. Murphy

Abstract

The number of males displaying in a lek or chorus each day is often positively correlated with the number of females visiting or mating in the aggregation. I tested hypotheses that might explain such correlations in a study of the barking treefrog (Hyla gratiosa). Experimental reduction of the number of calling males did not reduce female visitation, ruling out the hypothesis that such correlations are owing to female preference for, or passive attraction to, larger choruses. Separate regression of the numbers of males and females on 13 environmental variables explained 45--74% of the variance in the nightly numbers of males and females. Partial regression coefficients for most of the 13 variables were not significantly different between the sexes, and the relative importance of variables in explaining variation in the numbers of individuals was similar for both sexes. These results support the hypothesis that positive correlations between nightly numbers of males and females are owing to a similar response by both sexes to the same environmental variables. Thus, it appears that the intense sounds emanating from choruses of H. gratiosa do not function in long-range communication and may instead be an epiphenomenon of intense, short-range vocal competition for females. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher G. Murphy, 2003. "The cause of correlations between nightly numbers of male and female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) attending choruses," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(2), pages 274-281, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:274-281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:274-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.