IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i2p194-200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predator preference for brightly colored males in the guppy: a viability cost for a sexually selected trait

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Guy J. Godin
  • Heather E. McDonough

Abstract

Although conspicuous visual sexual signals, such as bright colors, in males serve to attract females in numerous species, they may also attract the attention of potential predators and thus may be costly in terms of increasing individual risk of mortality to predation. Most models of the evolution of extravagant male sexual traits and female preferences for them assume that the sexually preferred male trait is costly to produce and maintain. However, there is surprisingly little empirical evidence for direct fitness costs associated with sexually selected visual traits that enhance male mating success. In the present study, we report a direct fitness cost for sexually selected, bright body-color patterns in males in the form of an associated greater risk of mortality to predation. By using the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) and the blue acara cichlid fish (Aequidens pulcher) as a model prey--predator system, we demonstrate experimentally that individual cichlids preferentially and consistently approached, attacked, and captured the more brightly colored of two size-matched male guppies presented simultaneously in staged encounters. This resulted in the brightly colored male incurring, on average, a significantly higher risk of mortality given an encounter with the predator than with the drabber male in matched pairs. Our results constitute strong behavioral evidence for a direct viability cost associated with bright coloration in male guppies, and they corroborate the generally accepted paradigm that directional predation by visual fish predators against brightly colored, adult male guppies underlies the evolution of the known divergent color patterns in natural guppy populations that experience different intensities of predation. The viability cost associated with bright conspicuous coloration in male guppies potentially reinforces for females the reliability of this sexually selected trait as an indicator trait of male quality. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Guy J. Godin & Heather E. McDonough, 2003. "Predator preference for brightly colored males in the guppy: a viability cost for a sexually selected trait," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(2), pages 194-200, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:194-200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Josephine R. Paris & James R. Whiting & Mitchel J. Daniel & Joan Ferrer Obiol & Paul J. Parsons & Mijke J. Zee & Christopher W. Wheat & Kimberly A. Hughes & Bonnie A. Fraser, 2022. "A large and diverse autosomal haplotype is associated with sex-linked colour polymorphism in the guppy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Justa L. Heinen-Kay & Kirstin E. Morris & Nicole A. Ryan & Samantha L. Byerley & Rebecca E. Venezia & M. Nils Peterson & R. Brian Langerhans, 2015. "A trade-off between natural and sexual selection underlies diversification of a sexual signal," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 533-542.
    3. Guillem PĂ©rez i de Lanuza & Enrique Font, 2015. "Differences in conspicuousness between alternative color morphs in a polychromatic lizard," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1432-1446.
    4. Erin L. McCullough & Paul R. Weingarden & Douglas J. Emlen, 2012. "Costs of elaborate weapons in a rhinoceros beetle: how difficult is it to fly with a big horn?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1042-1048.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:194-200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.