IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i2p175-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ectoparasitism in marsh tits: costs and functional explanations

Author

Listed:
  • Jan-Å ke Nilsson

Abstract

Among hole-nesting birds, the blood-sucking hen flea is a common parasite affecting both nestlings and parents. By adding fleas to marsh tit (Parus palustris) nests, I aimed to investigate the effect of fleas on nestling growth rate and parental effort as well as evaluating a potential mechanism by which fleas affect nestlings (i.e., resting metabolic rate; RMR). Nestlings from flea-infested broods were lighter than nestlings from control broods. This reduced growth rate was evident as soon as 3 days after adding extra fleas to the nest, but the reduction did not increase after this initial drop in mass. Parents did not alter their feeding frequency in response to the manipulation; thus the small size of nestlings in manipulated nests seems to be directly caused by the fleas. Mass-specific RMR was significantly higher in nestlings from flea-infested nests compared to nestlings from control nests. I used the results to evaluate the suggested mechanisms for parasite-related decrease in host growth rate. The increase in RMR and the very rapid reduction in nestling growth rate after experimental addition of fleas can be explained by an immune reaction, mainly by the innate immune system, to substances in the saliva of the fleas. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan-Å ke Nilsson, 2003. "Ectoparasitism in marsh tits: costs and functional explanations," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(2), pages 175-181, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:175-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:175-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.