IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i2p151-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The behavioral ecology of a cognitive constraint: limited attention

Author

Listed:
  • Colin W. Clark
  • Reuven Dukas

Abstract

Limited attention may constrain animal behavior in situations in which the rate of relevant information exceeds the threshold processing capacity of the brain. In the present study, we examine why attention is limited by quantifying how attention affects the ubiquitous problem of balancing foraging and antipredator activity. We analyze how a given attentional capacity affects feeding requirements, the optimal attentional focus during predator scanning, and the probability of detecting predators. Our model indicates that because of the complex interplay between the costs and benefits associated with a given attentional capacity, limited attention can be an optimal strategy, which allows effective and economical search for cryptic objects. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin W. Clark & Reuven Dukas, 2003. "The behavioral ecology of a cognitive constraint: limited attention," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(2), pages 151-156, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:151-156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin R. Abbott & Thomas N. Sherratt, 2013. "Optimal sampling and signal detection: unifying models of attention and speed–accuracy trade-offs," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 605-616.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:2:p:151-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.