IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i1p97-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do energetic demands constrain incubation scheduling in a biparental species?

Author

Listed:
  • Will Cresswell
  • S. Holt
  • J. M. Reid
  • D. P. Whitfield
  • R. J. Mellanby

Abstract

The high energetic demands of incubation in birds may be an important ecological factor limiting the evolution of life-history traits, such as clutch size. In biparental species, however, the demands of incubation may not be a major constraint because there may always be sufficient feeding time available for the off-duty bird to regain energy used during an incubation bout. We investigated whether the energetic demands of incubation constrain optimum incubation bout length in a biparental incubator by decreasing the energetic demands of incubation. We put an insulated cup around the lining of semipalmated sandpiper nests so that the rate of cooling of eggs was reduced by 21%. Semipalmated sandpipers responded by increasing their mean incubation bout length of around 11.1 h by about 10%. Bout lengths in unmanipulated natural nests became longer as hatch approached (incubation stage), and this was independent of weather. Bout lengths may have decreased with increasing rainfall and were independent of time of day. The results suggest that bout length in semipalmated sandpipers is constrained by their cumulative energetic expenditure during an incubation bout, and this is determined partly by the high costs of steady-state incubation. The results also suggest that the incubating bird determines the bout length rather than the returning bird. Semipalmated sandpipersmay have maximized incubation bout length to minimize changeovers during incubation because these probably increasepredation risk. Selection to minimize the frequency of changeover may then be a factor contributing to the evolution ofbiparental care and life-history traits in semipalmated sandpipers. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Will Cresswell & S. Holt & J. M. Reid & D. P. Whitfield & R. J. Mellanby, 2003. "Do energetic demands constrain incubation scheduling in a biparental species?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(1), pages 97-102, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:97-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Bulla & Mihai Valcu & Anne L. Rutten & Bart Kempenaers, 2014. "Biparental incubation patterns in a high-Arctic breeding shorebird: how do pairs divide their duties?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 152-164.
    2. Martin Bulla & Will Cresswell & Anne L. Rutten & Mihai Valcu & Bart Kempenaers, 2015. "Biparental incubation-scheduling: no experimental evidence for major energetic constraints," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 30-37.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:97-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.