IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i1p68-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male ornamentation, timing of breeding, and cost of polygyny in the collared flycatcher

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Qvarnstro¨m
  • Ben C. Sheldon
  • Tomas Pa¨rt
  • Lars Gustafsson

Abstract

Highly ornamented males are often thought to be better able to provide females with resources, parental assistance, or good genes. Individual variation in such male abilities may override the costs of polygyny and therefore largely explain within-population variation in mating patterns. We investigated the influence of variation in male ornamentation and the environment on the costs of polygyny for female collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis), using data from a long-term study involving 2733 breeding attempts over 19 years. We show that females suffer reduced reproductive success when mated polygynously but that the costs of polygyny depend on an interaction between male ornamentation and timing of breeding. Among early breeders, polygynously mated females experience higher reproductive success when mated to less ornamented males, but among late breeders, females mated polygynously to highly ornamented males were more successful. We suggest that a high effort spent on obtaining extrapair matings early in the season renders highly ornamented males less able to assist two females in caring for the young. Thus, a male's ability to simultaneously gain from extrapair matings and polygyny may be limited through direct effects on female reproductive success. Given such limitation, extrapair matings may be expected to be less frequent in species with biparental care and a high level of social polygyny. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Qvarnstro¨m & Ben C. Sheldon & Tomas Pa¨rt & Lars Gustafsson, 2003. "Male ornamentation, timing of breeding, and cost of polygyny in the collared flycatcher," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(1), pages 68-73, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:68-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miklós Laczi & Dóra Kötél & János Török & Gergely Hegyi, 2017. "Mutual plumage ornamentation and biparental care: consequences for success in different environments," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1359-1368.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:68-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.