IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i1p63-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tests of the mate-guarding hypothesis for social monogamy: male snapping shrimp prefer to associate with high-value females

Author

Listed:
  • Lauren M. Mathews

Abstract

Social monogamy without biparental care has evolved in many taxa, and a number of hypotheses have been developed to explain this phenomenon. Several authors have suggested the importance of male mate-guarding behavior in the evolution of social monogamy, although empirical support for this hypothesis is lacking. In the caridean shrimp genus Alpheus, social monogamy may result from selection on males for long-term guarding of females because mating is temporally restricted to a short time after the female's molt. I used Alpheus angulatus to test two predictions of the extended mate-guarding hypothesis: Males should (1) be physiologically capable of predicting the timing of female sexual receptivity, and (2) prefer to associate with (guard) females that are closer to sexual receptivity. Data from a Y-maze experiment testing for distance chemical communication showed that males of A. angulatus were attracted to water treated by exposure to premolt females, repulsed by water treated by exposure to intermolt males and females, and did not appear to respond in either direction to water treated by exposure to premolt males. In mate choice experiments, significantly more males paired with premolt females than with postmolt females. These data suggest that males of A. angulatus engage in precopulatory mate-guarding behavior. Other factors (population density, sex ratio) may have played a role in the temporal extension of mate guarding to social monogamy. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauren M. Mathews, 2003. "Tests of the mate-guarding hypothesis for social monogamy: male snapping shrimp prefer to associate with high-value females," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(1), pages 63-67, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:63-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:63-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.