IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i1p34-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extremely female-biased sex ratio and lethal male--male combat in a parasitoid wasp, Melittobia australica (Eulophidae)

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Abe
  • Yoshitaka Kamimura
  • Natsuko Kondo
  • Masakazu Shimada

Abstract

Melittobia australica (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) is a gregarious ectoparasitoid of the prepupae and pupae of solitary wasps and bees. The males never disperse from their natal patch, and mating takes place only on the host from which they emerged. We measured the offspring sex ratio of M. australica with differing foundress numbers and examined combat between emerged males. The offspring sex ratios were extremely female biased and almost independent of foundress number in all cases. The population of M. australica used in the experiment was infected with the cytoplasmically inherited symbiotic bacterium Wolbachia. However, although Wolbachia is a potential sex-ratio distorter, noninfected individuals showed the same sex ratio patterns as the Wolbachia-infected individuals. An arena experiment showed that younger males were almost always killed by older males that had eclosed earlier. These results suggested that lethal male--male combat is an additional factor distorting the sex ratio toward a more female-biased sex ratio. This provides a new perspective on current local mate competition models. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Abe & Yoshitaka Kamimura & Natsuko Kondo & Masakazu Shimada, 2003. "Extremely female-biased sex ratio and lethal male--male combat in a parasitoid wasp, Melittobia australica (Eulophidae)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(1), pages 34-39, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:34-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:34-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.