IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i6p832-837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Congruence between the sexes in preexisting receiver responses

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra L. Basolo

Abstract

Preexisting receiver biases have been shown to affect how females detect and respond to new conspecific traits in a mate choice context. Although preexisting biases have often been discussed in the context of female mate choice, these biases need not be sex limited. In the genus Xiphophorus, swordtail males possess a sexually selected trait, the sword. Here I consider evidence that the state of a bias favoring sworded conspecifics may be generally shared by the sexes in taxa in which the sword has not arisen. In three unsworded species of poeciliid fishes, both males and females prefer members of the other sex with swords. In a fourth species, males and females share the absence of a response to a sword. This congruity between the sexes suggests that response biases may not be sex limited and that the sexes could historically share common mechanisms producing shared mating responses. Alternatively, selection may tend to result in parallel changes in biases in the sexes. This work expands our understanding of receiver biases by using a phylogenetic approach to examine whether biases are historically shared by the sexes and suggests that there can be general congruence between the sexes in such biases. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra L. Basolo, 2002. "Congruence between the sexes in preexisting receiver responses," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(6), pages 832-837, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:832-837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:832-837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.