IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i6p827-831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inhibition of optimal behavior by social transmission in the guppy depends on shoaling

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Bates
  • Jackie Chappell

Abstract

Previous research has suggested social learning of foraging behavior can inhibit learning of the optimal behavior pattern. Based on their transmission chain design, we used small groups of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) to determine the degree to which the optimal behavior pattern was inhibited by socially learned information. A founder group was trained to take a long, energetically costly route to a food source. The members of this group were gradually replaced with naive conspecifics. Replicating the findings of the earlier researchers, it was clear that the behavior of the founders strongly influenced the behavior of the naive fish, probably through a process of local enhancement. When tested as a group, the naive fish chose the long route to the food source significantly more often than chance. Each naive fish was also tested in isolation. When tested alone, there was a significant tendency to choose the short route despite following the long route when tested as a group. These results suggest social learning does not inhibit learning of optimal behavior patterns but that a trade-off occurs when tested in the group condition. It is possible that the advantages for an individual fish of swimming with the shoal, and thus following the socially learned route, may have outweighed the potential energetic costs of taking this longer route. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Bates & Jackie Chappell, 2002. "Inhibition of optimal behavior by social transmission in the guppy depends on shoaling," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(6), pages 827-831, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:827-831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:827-831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.