IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i6p742-749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phenotypic selection and function of reproductive behavior in the subsocial bug Elasmucha putoni (Heteroptera: Acanthosomatidae)

Author

Listed:
  • Shin-ichi Kudo

Abstract

To investigate the function of maternal care and determinants of reproductive success in the subsocial bug Elasmucha putoni (Heteroptera: Acanthosomatidae), I used two different approaches, the measurement of phenotypic selection and female-removal experiments under conditions differing in biotic-environmental pressure. For two field populations, unattended eggs and younger nymphs consistently suffered severe predation pressure and attendance by parent females greatly enhanced their survival. In contrast, under enemy-excluded conditions, offspring performance was not reduced in broods without parent females, indicating that maternal care functions as a physical defense against predators. However, the determinant of female reproductive success in E. putoni in the field was not the care behavior alone. Selection gradient analysis showed that early season oviposition and larger clutch size, as well as a longer duration of care by a female, was favored during the breeding episode. This study is the first to evaluate phenotypic selection on parental care and other reproductive traits in arthropods. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin-ichi Kudo, 2002. "Phenotypic selection and function of reproductive behavior in the subsocial bug Elasmucha putoni (Heteroptera: Acanthosomatidae)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(6), pages 742-749, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:742-749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:742-749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.