IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i6p725-727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Great tits (Parus major) reduce body mass in response to wing area reduction: a field experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Joan Carles Senar
  • Jordi Domènech
  • Francesc Uribe

Abstract

Flight performance is crucial in determining whether a small bird will survive an attack by a predator. Given the importance of body mass in determining flight performance, it has been suggested that birds should strategically regulate body mass as a response to predation risk. However, all experiments up to now have been carried out with captive birds, comparing experimental to control birds. Here we present data from the first experiment in the field using a within-individuals experimental design. The wing area of wild great tits, Parus major, was reduced by reversibly taping primaries five to seven. This allowed for the same individual to alternatively act as control or experimental bird. Great tits reduced body mass (but not pectoral muscle width) during episodes of wing area reduction, lending support to the view that the reduction in body mass experienced by birds during molt is a strategy rather than the result of energetic stress. Theoretical models establishing the different trade-offs that determine optimal body mass should therefore take into account this important life-history episode. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan Carles Senar & Jordi Domènech & Francesc Uribe, 2002. "Great tits (Parus major) reduce body mass in response to wing area reduction: a field experiment," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(6), pages 725-727, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:725-727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:6:p:725-727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.