Author
Listed:
- Vicente Polo
- Luis Miguel Bautista
Abstract
In a dominance-structured flock, social status may determine priority of access to food. Birds of low social status may perceive present and future access to food as less predictable, and so have a higher risk of starvation, than birds of high social rank. Theoretical models predict that subordinate birds should carry larger fat reserves and incur higher mass-dependent costs than dominants. However, empirical tests of the assumptions of these models are still scarce and controversial. We investigated the effect of dominance rank on daily mass gain under conditions of fluctuating food availability in a laboratory experiment using four flocks of four coal tits (Parus ater) each. The same amount of food was delivered in two treatments, but in one treatment the food was offered at a constant rate between days (fixed treatment), while in the other treatment the daily food supply varied in an unpredictable sequence between days (variable treatment). All birds showed greater variance in body mass in the variable treatment than in the fixed treatment. Body mass within birds showed the same variability at dawn than at dusk in the fixed treatment, but less variability at dawn than at dusk in the variable treatment. This may be a mechanism to reduce the immediate risk of starvation at the beginning of the day, when fat reserves are at their lowest and the aggression between flock members when feeding highest. Subordinate birds were excluded from the feeders by dominants more often in the early morning than in the rest of the day, and they showed more variability in daily mass gain and body mass at dawn than dominant birds. These results support the hypothesis that subordinate birds have a reduced probability of surviving when food availability changes unexpectedly compared to dominants. Copyright 2002.
Suggested Citation
Vicente Polo & Luis Miguel Bautista, 2002.
"Daily body mass regulation in dominance-structured coal tit (Parus ater) flocks in response to variable food access: a laboratory study,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(5), pages 696-704, September.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:696-704
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:696-704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.