Author
Abstract
I staged replicate encounters between unrestrained lizards and snakes in outdoor enclosures to examine size-dependent predation within the common garden skink (Lampropholis guichenoti). Yellow-faced whip snakes (Demansia psammophis) forage widely for active prey and most often consumed large skinks, whereas death adders (Acanthophis antarcticus) ambush active prey and most often consumed small skinks. Small-eyed snakes (Rhinoplocephalus nigrescens) forage widely for inactive prey and consumed both small and large skinks equally often. Differential predation may reflect active choice by the predator, differential prey vulnerability, or both. To test for active choice, I presented foraging snakes with an inert small lizard versus an inert large lizard. They did not actively select lizards of a particular body size. To test for differential prey vulnerability, I quantified variation between small and large lizards in behavior that is important for determining the outcome of predator--prey interactions. Snakes did not differentiate between integumentary chemicals from small and large lizards. Large lizards tend to flee from approaching predators, thereby eliciting attack by the visually oriented whip snakes. Small lizards were more mobile than large lizards and therefore more likely to pass by sedentary death adders. Additionally, small skinks were more effectively lured by this sit-and-wait species and less likely to avoid its first capture attempt. In contrast, overnight retreat site selection (not body size) determined a lizard's chances of being detected by small-eyed snakes. Patterns of size-dependent predation by elapid snakes may arise not because of active choice but as a function of species-specific predator tactics and prey behavior. Copyright 2002.
Suggested Citation
Sharon J. Downes, 2002.
"Size-dependent predation by snakes: selective foraging or differential prey vulnerability?,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(4), pages 551-560, July.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:4:p:551-560
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:4:p:551-560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.