Author
Listed:
- Thomas W. Chapman
- Brenda D. Kranz
- Kristi-Lee Bejah
- David C. Morris
- Michael P. Schwarz
- Bernard J. Crespi
Abstract
We estimated the degree of reproductive differentiation between foundresses and soldiers in multiple populations of five species of haplodiploid Australian gall-forming thrips using microsatellite data, ovarian dissections, and census data. Microsatellite-based species estimates of average per capita reproductive output of soldiers relative to the foundresses ranged from 0.005 to 0.64, and dissection and census-based estimates ranged from 0.17 to 1.1. Mapping of these estimates onto a phylogeny showed that levels of soldier reproduction were apparently higher in three basal lineages than in two more derived lineages. We infer from this phylogenetic pattern that soldier morphology and behavior of thrips evolved in the presence of substantial levels of soldier reproduction. This pattern of evolutionary change is similar to that proposed for the origin of soldiers in aphids and termites, but it differs from the scenario proposed for the origin of workers in Hymenoptera, within which helping and strong reproductive division of labor apparently evolved before morphological differentiation. We suggest that this difference in evolutionary routes to eusociality between taxa with soldiers and taxa with foraging workers was driven by a weaker trade-off between helping and reproducing, and a greater ability of the helpers to withstand reproductive domination, in taxa with soldiers. This is the first study to analyze the social-evolutionary trajectories of reproductive, behavioral, and morphological differentiation in the context of a species-level phylogeny. Copyright 2002.
Suggested Citation
Thomas W. Chapman & Brenda D. Kranz & Kristi-Lee Bejah & David C. Morris & Michael P. Schwarz & Bernard J. Crespi, 2002.
"The evolution of soldier reproduction in social thrips,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(4), pages 519-525, July.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:4:p:519-525
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:4:p:519-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.