IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i3p408-418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproductive skew, costs, and benefits of cooperative breeding in female wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus)

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriele Gerlach
  • Susann Bartmann

Abstract

Two current models seek to explain reproduction of subordinates in social groups: incentives given by dominants for peacefully remaining in the group (reproductive skew model) or incomplete control by dominants. These models make different predictions concerning genetic relatedness between individuals for the distribution of reproduction and the stability of cooperative breeding associations. To test these models and to further explore the relationships between reproductive skew, genetic relatedness, and investment of each participant, we performed behavioral observations of female wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) raising pups communally. Our results do not support previous models. Differences in lifetime reproductive success were significantly greater within mother--daughter pairs than within pairs of sisters or unrelated females. Subordinate females of either breeding unit did not differ in their direct reproduction. Calculations of inclusive fitness based on our results lead to the following predictions: (1) Communal nests should occur only when ecological circumstances prevent solitary breeding. (2) Subordinate females gain the highest inclusive fitness joining their mothers; they also show the highest nursing investment. (3) Mothers should accept daughters, who have no opportunity for solitary breeding. (4) Dominant sisters and unrelated females should reject subordinate females because cooperative breeding reduces their reproductive success. However, breeding units of dominant sisters and unrelated females nevertheless occur and can be explained by our finding that such females significantly reduce nursing time, which may help them save energy for future breeding cycles. Our data demonstrate that both genetic relatedness and investment skew are important in the complex evolution of reproductive skew in cooperative breeding. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriele Gerlach & Susann Bartmann, 2002. "Reproductive skew, costs, and benefits of cooperative breeding in female wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(3), pages 408-418, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:408-418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jessica L. Barker & Pat Barclay & H. Kern Reeve, 2012. "Within-group competition reduces cooperation and payoffs in human groups," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 735-741.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:408-418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.