Author
Listed:
- Matthew H. Persons
- Sean E. Walker
- Ann L. Rypstra
Abstract
Animals may exhibit a variety of defensive behaviors in the presence of indirect predator cues. Such behavior offers immediate fitness benefits but may also incur substantial foraging and reproductive costs. We measured shifts in space use (vertical climbing) by the wolf spider Pardosa milvina induced by chemotactile cues (silk and excreta) from a co-occurring predatory wolf spider Hogna helluo. We then measured foraging and reproductive costs, as well as survival benefits, of this behavior. For 2 weeks, we maintained mated adult female Pardosa in plastic containers with one of three treated peat moss substrates: a container previously occupied by a conspecific for 3 days, a container previously occupied by an adult Hogna for 3 days, and a container devoid of either cue (control). We measured prey capture efficiency, body condition, egg sac production, egg sac weight, and egg number for individuals in each treatment. We also counted the number of Pardosa that survived and exhibited climbing behavior in the presence of a live Hogna with and without silk and excreta cues. Pardosa climbed container walls significantly more often in the presence of Hogna silk and excreta relative to other treatments. Pardosa exposed to Hogna cues coupled with live Hogna survived significantly longer than spiders that had no predator cues available. Pardosa placed in containers with Hogna cues, but no Hogna, lost weight more quickly, ate fewer prey, were in poorer body condition, produced lighter egg sacs, and produced fewer eggs than spiders in control or conspecific treatments. Copyright 2002.
Suggested Citation
Matthew H. Persons & Sean E. Walker & Ann L. Rypstra, 2002.
"Fitness costs and benefits of antipredator behavior mediated by chemotactile cues in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae),"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(3), pages 386-392, May.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:386-392
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:386-392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.