IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i3p381-385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of California bay foliage by wood rats for possible fumigation of nest-borne ectoparasites

Author

Listed:
  • Richard B. Hemmes
  • Arlene Alvarado
  • Benjamin L. Hart

Abstract

Studies were conducted to test the hypothesis that dusky-footed wood rats (Neotoma fuscipes) place bay leaves (Umbellularia californica) on or near the sleeping nest in their stickhouses, with the result that the leaves act as a fumigant against nest-borne ectoparasites. Although many stickhouses were found to contain bay, oak, and toyon leaves, only bay was found significantly more often near the nest than away from the nest. Bay leaves were nibbled in a fashion consistent with the release of fumigating volatiles. Oak leaves, a known food staple, were nibbled in a fashion more consistent with eating. Analysis of the density of ectoparasites in samples of sleeping nest material showed few parasites in most nests, but heavy infestations in a few nests revealed the potential for large numbers of nest-borne ectoparasites. Samples of 1 g of whole and torn leaves of bay, toyon, and oak were incubated with flea larvae in mason jars for 72 h. Torn leaves (to simulate nibbling effects) of bay significantly reduced larval survival to 26% compared to 87-94% survival of larvae incubated with torn oak and toyon leaves. These findings provide evidence that dusky-footed wood rats place bay foliage around the sleeping nest with the effect of reducing their exposure to nest-borne ectoparasites. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard B. Hemmes & Arlene Alvarado & Benjamin L. Hart, 2002. "Use of California bay foliage by wood rats for possible fumigation of nest-borne ectoparasites," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(3), pages 381-385, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:381-385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:381-385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.