Author
Abstract
I tested predictions from ultimate hypotheses of why female great snipe Gallinago media give loud calls when visiting leks, using observational data and playback experiments. One hypothesis is that calls might be used in female--female competition for popular males, either (1) in an aggressive context toward a specific female, or (2) toward females in general to defend the male. It has also been suggested that female calls (3) may not have an adaptive function, the capability of vocalizing being explained as a correlated response to selection on male singing. Further, calls might function as (4) a copulation solicitation toward a specific male. Finally, calls might have a function in mate choice, either (5) in indirect mate choice as a fertility advertisement to incite male fighting, or (6) in direct mate choice as a mate-sampling aid to provoke quality-revealing responses from males. Disproportionately many female calls were uttered when no other females were present on a male's territory and in territories of males without mating success, contradicting hypotheses 1 and 2. Female calls were not associated with copulation; calls generally occurred several days before copulations, contradicting hypotheses 4 and 5. Playback of female calls attracted males and increased fighting among males, even if females were present nearby, contradicting hypothesis 3. Males changed their own songs in response to playback, and the response was related to their mating success. Taken together, the results are only consistent with one of the hypotheses considered--female calls may function as a mate-sampling aid used in direct mate choice. Copyright 2002.
Suggested Citation
Stein Are Sæther, 2002.
"Female calls in lek-mating birds: indirect mate choice, female competition for mates, or direct mate choice?,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(3), pages 344-352, May.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:344-352
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:344-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.