Author
Listed:
- Carole Smadja
- Guila Ganem
Abstract
Mate choice is the outcome of sexual preference for partners carrying specific signals. Thus, mating among conspecifics (homogamy) depends on the occurrence of species recognition systems. We asked what happens if populations diverge, and we investigated female sexual preference between two subspecies of the house mouse in populations from the borders of a hybrid zone (Jutland, Denmark). We used choice tests to analyze the occurrence of recognition signals and to locate these signals in soiled bedding and urine. Our results show that populations of the two subspecies can be discriminated on the basis of urinary signals, suggesting that the latter have diverged. Additionally, these signals seem to have similar features in populations of different geographical origins, suggesting that subspecific differentiation occurs. This is the first demonstration that subspecific recognition through urinary signals occurs in the house mouse. However, while Mus musculus domesticus does not display a preference, we show that Mus musculus musculus females tend to mate with males of the same subspecies. We discuss the different factors that could explain these discrepancies between females of the two taxa: differences in signal perception, evolution at a different pace, or evolution under different selective pressures in their area of contact. Further, we propose that the divergence in male signal was at least partly initiated in allopatry and discuss different evolutionary scenario that may explain the patterns observed in Denmark and their relevance to isolation between the two taxa. Copyright 2002.
Suggested Citation
Carole Smadja & Guila Ganem, 2002.
"Subspecies recognition in the house mouse: a study of two populations from the border of a hybrid zone,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(3), pages 312-320, May.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:312-320
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:3:p:312-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.