IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i2p239-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intracolonial patterns of reproduction in the queen-size dimorphic ant Leptothorax rugatulus

Author

Listed:
  • Olav Rüppell
  • Jürgen Heinze
  • Bert Hölldobler

Abstract

Animals that live in genetically heterogeneous groups are faced with a combination of cooperation and conflict. Reproductive skew theory aims to provide a unified theory of the partitioning of reproduction in animal societies by combining genetic, demographic, and environmental factors. Although theoretical elaborations abound, empirical data are rare. Specifically, explicit intraspecific tests are scarce and have provided conflicting results. We present data on reproductive partitioning among queens in the ant Leptothorax rugatulus with special emphasis on relatedness and body size. Relatedness was negatively correlated to skew in sexual offspring and uncorrelated to skew in total offspring. Body size was not correlated to a queen's reproductive share. Thus, we did not find any support for the classic optimal skew models that are based on concessions. In artificial colonies, composed of randomly selected, unrelated workers and queens, reproductive skew was higher than in natural colonies, which suggested that unequal reproduction among queens could arise without nepotism by workers. Again, a queen's body size was not a good indicator of her reproductive share, but egg laying rate was. In colonies that contained large and small queens, small queens produced proportionally more sexual offspring. Although this result is in accordance with the kin conflict over caste determination hypothesis, it is more plausibly explained by an adaptation of the caste ratios to alternative dispersal tactics. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Olav Rüppell & Jürgen Heinze & Bert Hölldobler, 2002. "Intracolonial patterns of reproduction in the queen-size dimorphic ant Leptothorax rugatulus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(2), pages 239-247, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:239-247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:239-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.