IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i2p188-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does paternity or paternal investment determine the level of paternal care and does female choice explain egg stealing in the fifteen-spined stickleback?

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Östlund-Nilsson

Abstract

An earlier field study on the fifteen-spined stickleback (Spinachia spinachia) showed that frequent male--male interactions result in high frequencies of sneaking and egg stealing. Moreover, sneaking behavior was performed not only by males adopting alternative mating strategies, but also by males with their own nests. The advantage of sneaking is easily understood, but it is more difficult to explain the evolutionary benefit of stealing eggs from other males. I investigated whether males suffering from sneaking adjust their paternal effort in relation to their degree of paternity. I also examined whether females prefer males that have more eggs in their nests, as this could explain egg stealing. There was no relationship between the degree of paternity and fanning activity, hatching success, or nest defense. However, the older the eggs become, the more the males increase their attack rate toward potential egg predators (goldsinny wrasse and shore crabs). Thus, males adjusted their level of defense to the amount of energy and time already invested in the clutch. Females did not prefer males with more eggs in their nests. On the contrary, females preferred males with reduced clutches over males with enlarged clutches. Therefore, female choice is unlikely to be a driving force behind egg stealing in this species. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Östlund-Nilsson, 2002. "Does paternity or paternal investment determine the level of paternal care and does female choice explain egg stealing in the fifteen-spined stickleback?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(2), pages 188-192, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:188-192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:188-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.