Author
Listed:
- Nicola Saino
- Michele Incagli
- Roberta Martinelli
- Anders Pape Møller
Abstract
Life-history theory posits trade-offs between fitness components. Reproduction negatively affects physiology and immune system functioning, and the effect of this form of stress may be mediated by glucocorticosteroids. We manipulated brood size of barn swallows (Hirundo rustica) to study the effect of stress arising from reproductive effort on corticosterone levels of males. We also measured T-cell--mediated immunocompetence by intradermally injecting birds with phytohemagglutinin, which is mitogenic to T-lymphocytes. The results confirmed the prediction of a negative effect of parental effort on lymphoproliferative response. We found no covariation between immune response and corticosterone levels. Males with long tails, an ornament currently under directional sexual selection, had a relatively large T-cell response to the mitogen, consistent with models of parasite-mediated sexual selection predicting higher levels of immune defense in highly ornamented males. In addition, males with large sexual ornaments had relatively low corticosterone levels at the end of the parental period. These results can be reconciled with the hypothesis proposing a trade-off between parental activities and adaptive immunity and suggest that highly ornamented males are less exposed or less susceptible to stress arising from parental effort. Copyright 2002.
Suggested Citation
Nicola Saino & Michele Incagli & Roberta Martinelli & Anders Pape Møller, 2002.
"Immune response of male barn swallows in relation to parental effort, corticosterone plasma levels, and sexual ornamentation,"
Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(2), pages 169-174, March.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:169-174
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:169-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.