IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i2p154-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Specialized predation on plataspid heteropterans in a coccinellid beetle: adaptive behavior and responses of prey attended or not by ants

Author

Listed:
  • A. Dejean
  • J. Orivel
  • M. Gibernau

Abstract

Two plataspid hemipteran species proliferated on Bridelia micrantha (Euphorbiaceae). Colonies of Libyaspis sp., never attended by ants, developed on branches, while Caternaultiella rugosa lived at the base of the trunks, mostly in association with Camponotus brutus that attends them in carton shelters. Both plataspid species are prey of the coccinellid beetle Anisolemnia tetrasticta, whose larvae always detected them by contact. When attacked the Libyaspis nymphs cowered, so that the hypertrophied lateral sides of their tergits made contact with the substrate, but the ladybirds slid their long forelegs under these nymphs, lifted them, and bit them on the ventral face. The Caternaultiella nymphs, which do not have hypertrophied extremities of the tergits, tried to escape at contact with the ladybirds, but were rarely successful. To capture them, the ladybirds either adopted the previous behavior or directly grasped then bit them. We noted a graded aggressiveness in the ants toward the ladybirds according to the situation: no aggressiveness on the tree branches; stopping the ladybirds that approached the shelters where the ants attended Caternaultiella; and full attack of ladybirds that tried to capture Caternaultiella nymphs situated outside shelters. The latter behavior can emit an alarm pheromone that triggers the dispersion of their congeners while attracting attending C. brutus workers. Naive workers are not attracted, so we deduce that this behavior is the result of a kind of learning. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Dejean & J. Orivel & M. Gibernau, 2002. "Specialized predation on plataspid heteropterans in a coccinellid beetle: adaptive behavior and responses of prey attended or not by ants," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(2), pages 154-159, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:154-159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:154-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.