IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i2p149-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female preference function related to precedence effect in an amphibian anuran (Alytes cisternasii): tests with non-overlapping calls

Author

Listed:
  • Jaime Bosch
  • Rafael Márquez

Abstract

We quantified precedence effect (measured as female preference for the leading calls in an acoustic interaction between two males) with non-overlapping, simulated male calls presented with various phase relationships to female Iberian midwife toads (Alytes cisternasii) in two-speaker phonotaxis playback tests. The resulting information determines the shape of the female preference function for intercall delays. Females preferentially approached leading callers for most tested phase angles. We found a gradation in the degree to which females selected the leader. They tended to exert a strong preference for the leader in 30° test, and at higher phase angles, the overall preference was weaker and graded (the higher the phase angle, the lower the preference). Other parameters of female preference (latency and repeatability) also had a graded relationship with phase angle value. The sharp difference in probability of approach between 30° and 60° is consistent with a mechanism of male calling inhibition immediately after hearing a competitor's call previously described in other taxa. In natural interactions, male A. cisternasii adjust the timing of their calls to a phase angle that provides a slight but significant advantage to the leading caller. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaime Bosch & Rafael Márquez, 2002. "Female preference function related to precedence effect in an amphibian anuran (Alytes cisternasii): tests with non-overlapping calls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(2), pages 149-153, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:149-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:149-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.