IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i1p83-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mate sampling and the sexual conflict over mating in seaweed flies

Author

Listed:
  • David M. Shuker

Abstract

The order in which females encounter, or sample, males in a population may have important consequences for mate choice, with the information gathered about males influencing both the preference function and degree of choosiness of females. Sexual selection may be affected as a result. Sampling of particular subsets of males may be a crucial component of individual variation in mate preferences within populations. However, the sequence in which males are sampled may also be important in species without traditional, active mate choice, such as when sexual selection involves sexual conflict over mating. This would occur if the likelihood of a female mating with a male of a certain phenotype changes as a result of previous encounters. We examined the effects of encountering males differing in body size, a sexually selected phenotype, in the seaweed fly Coelopa frigida. Sexual selection occurs in this species as a result of a sexual conflict over mating. We show that the outcome of the sexual conflict is independent of the order in which males are encountered by female seaweed flies, with the overall mating advantage to large males being unaffected. In addition, we explored female preference functions and evaluate the heterogeneity in female willingness to mate. We suggest that consideration of mate sampling theory is valuable when examining mate choice in species in which sexual selection is driven by sexual conflict. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • David M. Shuker, 2002. "Mate sampling and the sexual conflict over mating in seaweed flies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(1), pages 83-86, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:83-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:83-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.