IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i1p134-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sociality in river otters: cooperative foraging or reproductive strategies?

Author

Listed:
  • Gail M. Blundell
  • Merav Ben-David

Abstract

We evaluated factors influencing social organization in coastal river otters (Lontra canadensis) to test two hypotheses: group formation is an antipredation strategy, or, alternatively, group information is related to cooperative foraging. Data on group size, group composition, and sociality were obtained through radiotracking 55 otters in Prince William Sound, Alaska, USA, from 1996 through 1998. For males, larger groups occurred after the mating season and concurrent with availability of schooling pelagic fishes. Stable isotope analysis revealed that otters social in >10% of their locations had diets significantly higher in rapidly swimming pelagic fishes than did less social otters, regardless of gender. In addition, otters that were more social had significantly smaller home ranges than did less social otters, an observation consistent with increased foraging efficiency through cooperative foraging. Discounting associations of females with young of the year, approximately 47% of females and only 24% of males were asocial. Among social otters, males were social in 46% of their locations and 63% of that time occurred in all-male groups. Females were only social in 26% of locations and were in mixed-sex groups 78% of that time. We hypothesize that the time-consuming task of raising offspring prevents females from joining foraging groups. When not raising young, females may join males to cooperatively forage for better-quality prey (pelagic fishes), which would be more difficult to acquire as a solitary forager. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Gail M. Blundell & Merav Ben-David, 2002. "Sociality in river otters: cooperative foraging or reproductive strategies?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(1), pages 134-141, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:134-141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:134-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.