IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i1p101-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative manipulation of predation risk in incubating birds reveals variability in the plasticity of responses

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron K. Ghalambor

Abstract

The evolution of different parental care strategies is thought to result from variation in trade-offs between the costs and benefits associated with providing care. However, changing environmental conditions can alter such fitness trade-offs and favor plasticity in the type or amount of parental care provided. Avian incubation is a form of parental care where parents face changing environmental conditions, including variation in the risk of nest predation. Because parental activity can draw attention to the location of the nest, a reduction in nest visitation rates is a predicted response to an increased, immediate predation risk. Here, we experimentally increased the risk of nest predation using model presentations at nests of five coexisting species that differ in their ambient levels of nest predation. We examined whether individuals detect changes in nest predation risk and respond by reducing visitation to the nest. We also tested whether this behavioral response differs among species relative to differences in their ambient risk of nest predation. We found that males of all species detected the increased predation risk and reduced the rate at which they visited the nest to feed incubating females, and the magnitude of this change was highly correlated with differences in the risk of nest predation across species. Hence, as the vulnerability to nest predation increases, males appear more willing to trade the cost of reduced food delivery to the female against the benefit of reduced predation risk. Our results therefore suggest that nest predators can have differential effects on parental behaviors across species. We discuss how the comparative nature of our results can also provide insight into the evolution of behavioral plasticity. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2002. "Comparative manipulation of predation risk in incubating birds reveals variability in the plasticity of responses," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(1), pages 101-108, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:101-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helen R. Sofaer & T. Scott Sillett & Susana I. Peluc & Scott A. Morrison & Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2013. "Differential effects of food availability and nest predation risk on avian reproductive strategies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 698-707.
    2. Isaac Gravolin & Topi K Lehtonen & Nicholas D S Deal & Ulrika Candolin & Bob B M Wong, 2021. "Male reproductive adjustments to an introduced nest predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1163-1170.
    3. Daiping Wang & Wenyuan Zhang & Shuai Yang & Xiang-Yi Li Richter, 2023. "Sex differences in avian parental care patterns vary across the breeding cycle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:1:p:101-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.