IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/apecpp/v34y2012i3p531-553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Adoption of Pharmaceutical Innovation Respond to Changes in the Regulatory Environment?

Author

Listed:
  • Nebibe Varol
  • Joan Costa-Font
  • Alistair McGuire

Abstract

This paper investigates how regulation impinged on the launch strategies of international pharmaceutical corporations for new molecules across the main OECD markets between 1960–2008. Comprehensive IMS data is used to analyze the international diffusion of 845 molecules from 14 different anatomic therapeutic categories using non-parametric survival analysis. The paper focuses on two main regulatory changes that substantially reshaped the barriers to entry: the U.S. Hatch-Waxman Act in 1984, and the establishment of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 1995. We find that legal transaction costs have a significant impact on timing of launch. Stringent market authorization requirements for new pharmaceutical products in the United States after 1962 resulted in a significant U.S. drug lag in the introduction of pharmaceutical innovation vis-à-vis Europe from 1960–1984. However, financial incentives stemming from the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Act proved effective in closing this lag. A more streamlined EMA regulatory approval process has reduced barriers to entry in Europe, thereby enabling quicker diffusion of pharmaceutical products, yet a marked pattern of delay in the adoption of innovation is still evident due to local differences in pricing regulations. Any new molecule launch strategically takes place first in higher-priced European Union (EU) markets as a result of the threat of arbitrage and price dependency across EU Member States. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Nebibe Varol & Joan Costa-Font & Alistair McGuire, 2012. "Does Adoption of Pharmaceutical Innovation Respond to Changes in the Regulatory Environment?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(3), pages 531-553.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:3:p:531-553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/pps027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolas Houy & Izabela Jelovac, 2014. "Drug approval decision times, international reference pricing and strategic launches of new drugs," Working Papers halshs-01072741, HAL.
    2. Nicolas Houy & Izabela Jelovac, 2015. "Drug Launch Timing and International Reference Pricing," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(8), pages 978-989, August.
    3. Dai, Rong & Watal, Jayashree, 2021. "Product patents and access to innovative medicines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    4. Zhang, Wei & Guh, Daphne P. & Grootendorst, Paul & Hollis, Aidan & Anis, Aslam H., 2024. "The impact of changing the reference countries on the list prices for patented medicines in Canada: A policy analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Joan Costa‐Font & Rosella Levaggi, 2020. "Innovation, aging, and health care: Unraveling “silver” from “red” herrings?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(S1), pages 3-7, October.
    6. Watal, Jayashree & Dai, Rong, 2019. "Product patents and access to innovative medicines in a post-trips-era," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2019-05, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:3:p:531-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.