IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/apecpp/v34y2012i3p428-453..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Participatory Forestry Program on Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Lessons From an Indian Province

Author

Listed:
  • Nimai Das

Abstract

This paper examines how rural livelihoods are improved owing to the impact of policy interventions through community-driven forest management in West Bengal, India. As an instance of comparative analysis of a gender-sensitive forestry program, this study employs the "sustainable rural livelihoods" framework to assess any enhancement of livelihood opportunities across various socioeconomic groups in forest fringe areas. In general, robust livelihoods sustainability is found for a pro-poor section of rural households that participated in the forestry program. Amongst participants, however, especially the feminine units attain more favorable livelihoods outcome. Conversely, the program's eschewed households are behind sustainable livelihoods. It is therefore early need to expand the participatory forestry program for sustaining poor households' livelihood security in forest fringe areas of rural India.

Suggested Citation

  • Nimai Das, 2012. "Impact of Participatory Forestry Program on Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Lessons From an Indian Province," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(3), pages 428-453.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:3:p:428-453.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/pps018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yusuph J. Kulindwa, 2016. "Key factors that influence households’ tree planting behaviour," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 40(1-2), pages 37-50, February.
    2. Biswajit Ray & Promita Mukherjee, 2023. "Forest Income and Rural Livelihoods in West Bengal, India," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 11(1), pages 10-35, April.
    3. Josephson, Anna & Michler, Jeffrey D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Beasts of the field? Ethics in agricultural and applied economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Chao Wang & Jiayi Tang, 2020. "Ritualized Law and Livelihood Fragility of Left-Behind Women in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Sanjib Mondal & Pritam Ghosh & Pratima Rohatgi, 2023. "Village‐level livelihood security: A case study on a wasteland‐dominated forest fringe region of rural India," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 1019-1036, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:3:p:428-453.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.