IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/apecpp/v34y2012i2p346-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reforming Long-term Care Funding Arrangements in England: International Lessons

Author

Listed:
  • Jose-Luis Fernandez
  • Julien Forder

Abstract

Ever since the failed 1999 Royal Commission, England has been attempting to reform its long-term care funding system. More than a decade later, significant changes to the means tested arrangements are yet to be introduced, whilst the pressure to achieve long-term reform mounts linked to increases in public expenditure and ever growing demand for better services. This paper examines the pros and cons of alternative options for reforming the English long-term care funding arrangements by examining the rationale for and consequences of the recent long-term care developments in Germany, Japan and France. In particular, the paper examines the implications of the reform options adopted in the different countries examined for equity and efficiency in the use of long-term care resources and for the sustainability of the long-term care system as a whole. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose-Luis Fernandez & Julien Forder, 2012. "Reforming Long-term Care Funding Arrangements in England: International Lessons," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 346-362.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:2:p:346-362
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/pps020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wildman, John & McMeekin, Peter, 2014. "Health care and social care: complements, substitutes and attributes," MPRA Paper 54425, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:2:p:346-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.