IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/apecpp/v34y2012i1p167-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Producers' Participation in Agricultural Cooperatives: Evidence from Northern China

Author

Listed:
  • Shi Zheng
  • Zhigang Wang
  • Titus O. Awokuse

Abstract

Agricultural producer cooperatives are of great significance to the development of agricultural productivity and can provide improved economic welfare benefits to farmers. However, such organizations have not been well-developed in China. While China's new Cooperatives Law of 2007 has generated interest among scholars, very few empirical analyses have focused on the role of cooperatives in China's agricultural sector. The main objective of this study is to investigate the determinants of farmers' perception and their decision to participate in cooperatives, using a unique dataset from recently collected survey data of farming households in China's Jilin Province. The empirical results from probit and logit regression models suggest that educational attainment, risk comfort level, farm expansion, operational costs, geographic location and crop types are significant factors that influence producers' perception of cooperatives, as well as their participation behavior. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi Zheng & Zhigang Wang & Titus O. Awokuse, 2012. "Determinants of Producers' Participation in Agricultural Cooperatives: Evidence from Northern China," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(1), pages 167-186.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:1:p:167-186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aepp/ppr044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:apecpp:v:34:y:2012:i:1:p:167-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.