IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/amlawe/v7y2005i2p484-522.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The (Legal) Value of Chance: Distorted Measures of Recovery in Private Law

Author

Listed:
  • Omri Ben-Shahar
  • Robert A. Mikos

Abstract

Parties who make investments that generate externalities may sometimes recover from the beneficiaries, even in the absence of contract. Previous scholarship has shown that granting recovery, based on either the cost of reasonable investment or the benefit conferred, can provide optimal incentives to invest. This article demonstrates that the law often awards recovery that is neither purely cost-based nor purely benefit-based and instead equals either the greater or lesser of the two measures. These hybrid approaches to recovery distort compensation and incentives. The article demonstrates the surprising prevalence of these practices and explores informational and institutional reasons why they emerge. Copyright 2005, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Omri Ben-Shahar & Robert A. Mikos, 2005. "The (Legal) Value of Chance: Distorted Measures of Recovery in Private Law," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 484-522.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:7:y:2005:i:2:p:484-522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aler/ahi014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:7:y:2005:i:2:p:484-522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/aler .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.