IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v98y2016i5p1529-1544..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price Density Forecasts in the U.S. Hog Markets: Composite Procedures

Author

Listed:
  • Andres Trujillo-Barrera
  • Philip Garcia
  • Mindy L. Mallory

Abstract

We develop and evaluate quarterly out-of-sample individual and composite density forecasts for U.S. hog prices. Individual density forecasts are generated using time series models and the implied distributions of USDA and Iowa State University outlook forecasts. Composite density forecasts are constructed using linear and logarithmic combinations of the individual forecasts and several weighting schemes. Density forecasts are evaluated on predictive accuracy (sharpness), goodness of fit (calibration), and their economic value in a hedging simulation. Logarithmic combinations using equal and mean square error weights outperform all individual density forecasts and are modestly better than linear composites. Comparison of the outlook forecasts to the best composite demonstrates the usefulness of the composite procedure, and identifies the economic value that more accurate expected price probability distributions can provide to producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Andres Trujillo-Barrera & Philip Garcia & Mindy L. Mallory, 2016. "Price Density Forecasts in the U.S. Hog Markets: Composite Procedures," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1529-1544.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:98:y:2016:i:5:p:1529-1544.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aaw050
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael K. Adjemian & Valentina G. Bruno & Michel A. Robe, 2020. "Incorporating Uncertainty into USDA Commodity Price Forecasts," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 696-712, March.
    2. Paolo Libenzio Brignoli & Alessandro Varacca & Cornelis Gardebroek & Paolo Sckokai, 2024. "Machine learning to predict grains futures prices," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(3), pages 479-497, May.
    3. Dabin Zhang & Qian Li & Amin W. Mugera & Liwen Ling, 2020. "A hybrid model considering cointegration for interval‐valued pork price forecasting in China," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(8), pages 1324-1341, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:98:y:2016:i:5:p:1529-1544.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.