IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v97y2015i2p469-489..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economics of Collective Reputation: Evidence from the Wine Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Castriota
  • Marco Delmastro

Abstract

We use original data regarding the array of Italian winery coalitions (wine denominations) to analyze the economics and determinants of collective reputation. We first run a cross-sectional analysis with 2008 data and the full set of control variables, then move to the dynamics of collective reputation with panel data analysis on a 30-year time span (1978-2008). Group reputation is history-dependent. In particular, past bad collective behavior increases the probability of being stuck in a "bad reputation trap" Minimum quality standards and effective enforcement are fundamental drivers of group reputation. The relationship between group size and collective reputation is non-linear: free entry may not be optimal due to free-riding problems. Finally, institutional signals such as the wine classification system are useful because they can be used by consumers as easily available proxies for information that is much more difficult to acquire.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Castriota & Marco Delmastro, 2015. "The Economics of Collective Reputation: Evidence from the Wine Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(2), pages 469-489.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:97:y:2015:i:2:p:469-489.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aau107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:97:y:2015:i:2:p:469-489.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.