IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v95y2013i1p117-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rent-Seeking and Incentives for Compliance in the Commons

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Holzer
  • Douglas Lipton
  • Olivier François

Abstract

This article studies how rent-seeking behavior induces an informal leasing market for fishing licenses that leads harvesters in a common pool to circumvent rules set by the manager to conserve the resource, as well as how the vulnerability of the resource to such behavior depends on the management approach adopted. License leasing reduces fleet heterogeneity in terms of catch per unit effort as demonstrated by the outward shift in the stochastic production frontier. While aggregate harvest is invariant to alternative profiles of fleet heterogeneity in quota-managed fisheries, the productivity of the restricted variable--total effort--increases with the number of leasing contracts in input-controlled fisheries. If unanticipated by the regulator, the additional pressure on the resource may lead to overfishing and compromise the long-term viability of the industry. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Holzer & Douglas Lipton & Olivier François, 2013. "Rent-Seeking and Incentives for Compliance in the Commons," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(1), pages 117-130.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:95:y:2013:i:1:p:117-130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ajae/aas077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Czyżewski, Bazyli & Matuszczak, Anna, 2018. "Rent-seeking in agricultural policy revisited: a new look at the Common Agricultural Policy consensus," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(2), August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:95:y:2013:i:1:p:117-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.